PROTRACK

A forum devoted to track events from 60m to the 2 mile. Mainly pro but also news from local, national and international sprint & middle distance competitions.

Log in

I forgot my password



Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» Castlemaine Results
Yesterday at 9:51 pm by JH

» Women’s Handicaps have gone crazy’s
Yesterday at 8:43 am by Thatsthestats

» St. Albans results.
Sat Jan 20, 2018 10:28 pm by JH

» St Albans Gift
Fri Jan 19, 2018 10:21 pm by timrosen35

» Castlemaine Gift
Fri Jan 19, 2018 8:43 pm by Mex

» Marion Gift Review - Tim Johnson's Breakthrough victory
Fri Jan 19, 2018 1:46 pm by Admin

» Handicap anomalies
Fri Jan 19, 2018 1:35 pm by Slowcoach

» An SAAL decision that is as weird as it gets
Fri Jan 19, 2018 7:26 am by Whispers

» Men's 100m at Adelaide Invitational - Triple Dead Heat for 3rd?
Thu Jan 18, 2018 10:53 pm by Whispers

January 2018
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Calendar Calendar


You are not connected. Please login or register

PROTRACK » GENERAL » strickland handicaps revised

strickland handicaps revised

View previous topic View next topic Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

1 strickland handicaps revised on Wed Apr 01, 2015 10:31 am

Guest

avatar
Guest
graf now 3.5

whittaker   2.0


check out full field val website all marks for field shown  above two one's I noticed

that had changed 


makes graf odds now blown,

I know the glory in running am's, but losing a metre for same makes little sense to me  we all have differing views

i'll bet winner of gift has very poor form in the ammo's

2 Re: strickland handicaps revised on Wed Apr 01, 2015 11:43 pm

Slowcoach


Thanks Bazzap.

In this day and age, I cant understand why we have to scour through the handicaps to see if there are any changes?

Why the secrecy?


In fact the VAL should use it for publicity.

"Sprint Stars get re-handicapped for Stawell".

You dont see the VRC hiding how much they penalise the Caulfield Cup winner for the Melb Cup. The opposite........it is headlines in the paper. Creates more interest and raises the profile of the Cup.

View previous topic View next topic Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum