PROTRACK

A forum devoted to track events from 60m to the 2 mile. Mainly pro but also news from local, national and international sprint & middle distance competitions.

Log in

I forgot my password



Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» Bunbury Gift timetable
Mon Apr 23, 2018 5:21 pm by Pro Pasto

» VRTA Awards - Final chance to purchase tickets.
Mon Apr 23, 2018 8:27 am by Downesy

» Women's Gift
Sun Apr 22, 2018 8:14 pm by Slowcoach

» Bunbury Gift entries close 9th of April
Thu Apr 19, 2018 4:18 pm by youngy

» VRTA Awards 2017/18 Nominations and Top 5's
Wed Apr 18, 2018 11:34 am by Downesy

» VRTA Awards - 28th of April 2018. Melbourne Bowling Club. 7pm.
Tue Apr 17, 2018 8:09 am by Downesy

» WOMENS BUNBURY GIFT
Mon Apr 16, 2018 9:01 am by HarryWho

» Bunbury Gift entry lists
Thu Apr 12, 2018 12:29 pm by Pro Pasto

» Electronic timing at Stawell
Tue Apr 10, 2018 2:56 pm by Whispers

April 2018
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Calendar Calendar


You are not connected. Please login or register

PROTRACK » GENERAL » strickland handicaps revised

strickland handicaps revised

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

1 strickland handicaps revised on Wed Apr 01, 2015 10:31 am

Guest

avatar
Guest
graf now 3.5

whittaker   2.0


check out full field val website all marks for field shown  above two one's I noticed

that had changed 


makes graf odds now blown,

I know the glory in running am's, but losing a metre for same makes little sense to me  we all have differing views

i'll bet winner of gift has very poor form in the ammo's

2 Re: strickland handicaps revised on Wed Apr 01, 2015 11:43 pm

Slowcoach


Thanks Bazzap.

In this day and age, I cant understand why we have to scour through the handicaps to see if there are any changes?

Why the secrecy?


In fact the VAL should use it for publicity.

"Sprint Stars get re-handicapped for Stawell".

You dont see the VRC hiding how much they penalise the Caulfield Cup winner for the Melb Cup. The opposite........it is headlines in the paper. Creates more interest and raises the profile of the Cup.

Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum