PROTRACK

A forum devoted to track events from 60m to the 2 mile. Mainly pro but also news from local, national and international sprint & middle distance competitions.

Log in

I forgot my password



Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» Bunbury Gift timetable
Mon Apr 23, 2018 5:21 pm by Pro Pasto

» VRTA Awards - Final chance to purchase tickets.
Mon Apr 23, 2018 8:27 am by Downesy

» Women's Gift
Sun Apr 22, 2018 8:14 pm by Slowcoach

» Bunbury Gift entries close 9th of April
Thu Apr 19, 2018 4:18 pm by youngy

» VRTA Awards 2017/18 Nominations and Top 5's
Wed Apr 18, 2018 11:34 am by Downesy

» VRTA Awards - 28th of April 2018. Melbourne Bowling Club. 7pm.
Tue Apr 17, 2018 8:09 am by Downesy

» WOMENS BUNBURY GIFT
Mon Apr 16, 2018 9:01 am by HarryWho

» Bunbury Gift entry lists
Thu Apr 12, 2018 12:29 pm by Pro Pasto

» Electronic timing at Stawell
Tue Apr 10, 2018 2:56 pm by Whispers

April 2018
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Calendar Calendar


You are not connected. Please login or register

PROTRACK » GENERAL » Marion (SAAL) HANDICAPS - Sunday 11th January 2015

Marion (SAAL) HANDICAPS - Sunday 11th January 2015

Go to page : Previous  1, 2

Go down  Message [Page 2 of 2]

youngy

avatar
Admin
Admin
There's some very good points raised here and I certainly take some of it on board.

Changing marks on the day is not something I would like to see nor will be doing.

I think the compromise is to check the results of previous years for that specific track and handicap according to the expected track conditions.  We can often fall into the trap of taking too much notice of a PB off fast conditions from a synthetic surface for 100m and the difference when running on a spongey grass track over 120m can render the calculations, a waste of time.  

Overall I think this type of discussion is healthy & productive. The more transparency around handicapping issues the better.


_________________
"Let's Go While We're Young"

lhd


It's really pleasing to see this discussion going on.

This gender handicapping challenge is not new, in my 5 years of coaching the girls have enjoyed very, very little success in mixed races! This challenge does not only exist in U20 sprinting, it goes across all the distances in most/all of the under age categories.

Meeting this challenge, is not just for Youngy, but, for all handicappers, officials and office holders associated with Leagues across our country.

Also, really pleased to see a man of high principles and standards, Shane McK, outline the primary responsibility that coaches of junior athletes (should) share re development and culture.

Rookie


I find all this quite interesting and although I totally disagree with changing marks on the day I like the thought of trying to handicap to certain venues for younger athletes as Youngy mentioned a pb on a synthetic track with a tail wind hardly means anything on a wet grass track into a headwind.
The thing I would find most intruging is the age divide.
In the u20s as everyone has mentioned the female athletes tend to struggle in trying conditions but I would say if you looked into the u14's age group where girls have GENERALLY developed slightly more than boys would it all be turned around with the boys getting a lift?

Anyway Youngy your doing a fantastic job and the hard work hasnt gone unnoticed. Thanks.

Sponsored content


Back to top  Message [Page 2 of 2]

Go to page : Previous  1, 2

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum