A forum devoted to track events from 60m to the 2 mile. Mainly pro but also news from local, national and international sprint & middle distance competitions.

Log in

I forgot my password


Display results as :

Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» Parkdale Results
Yesterday at 8:30 pm by JH

» 2018 Womens' 120m Stawell Gift
Yesterday at 8:12 pm by Admin

» 2018 Stawell Gift Form Guide is coming.......SOON
Fri Mar 23, 2018 8:08 pm by Hurricane

» VRTA Awards Dinner. 2017/2018 Season. Save the Date - Saturday 28th April 2018.
Fri Mar 23, 2018 5:25 pm by mwebster

» Stawell Gift Final - where do we stand?
Fri Mar 23, 2018 4:48 pm by timrosen35

» VRTA Points - Top 10's after Bendigo.
Thu Mar 22, 2018 1:16 pm by Downesy

» Stawell Gift 2018 - 98 athletes return from 2017
Wed Mar 21, 2018 4:01 pm by Admin

» Bunbury Gift entries close 9th of April
Mon Mar 19, 2018 2:37 pm by Pro Pasto

» Past "Bill Howard Winners"
Sun Mar 18, 2018 5:23 pm by Todd Ireland

March 2018

Calendar Calendar

You are not connected. Please login or register

PROTRACK » GENERAL » Tyson Gay, entourage and patience. (Good story on why Tyson Gay is entitled to a reduced sentence)

Tyson Gay, entourage and patience. (Good story on why Tyson Gay is entitled to a reduced sentence)

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]



Tyson Gay, entourage and patience

by Alan Abrahamson
May 6, 2014

Track and field

Tyson Gay after winning the 200 in 19.74 seconds at the US nationals on June 23, 2013, the day his sample was collected // photo Getty Images

We live now in such a sound-bite society.

Too, we swim in a culture in which everyone wants answers, a definitive result, the end of the story — right now.

Particularly when it comes to matters involving doping and entourage.

Sorry, everyone. That’s not the way the real world works.

The first burst of news coverage has now come and gone involving Tyson Gay, the American record-holder in the 100-meter dash and, to be honest, almost all of it was enough to make you wonder why anyone would voluntarily come clean.

Gay’s case rightfully ought to be seen through a different lens.

It ought to be viewed as part of a larger, more comprehensive move by authorities, in particular the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency, to learn and then use what an athlete knows to try to break the circle of doping — by going after, if applicable, coaches, trainers, managers, agents, doctors, other athletes, whoever.

In this case the athlete happened to be one of the biggest names in the biggest sport in the Olympic movement.

As Gay said when he was first busted, “I basically put my trust in someone and I was let down.”

David Epstein, in a story co-published with ProPublica and Sports Illustrated, has reported that Gay tested positive — he failed three tests — for a steroid or steroid precursor believed to have come from a cream given to him by Atlanta chiropractor and “anti-aging specialist” Clayton Gibson III.

But — assuming all that is true, and Epstein has consistently proven a first-rate reporter — Gay didn’t just pick up the phone and call Gibson. There’s way more to the story. That’s what Gay has now told USADA: everything else.

The USADA news release notes, in the specific language of the World Anti-Doping Code, that Gay provided “substantial assistance.”

The way USADA works, you can be sure there were multiple meetings. There were documents. There were products.

We will learn about all the rest of those connections. Be sure there are those who have traveled in track and field circles — and perhaps not just in the United States — who ought to be plenty anxious.

Draw your own conclusions but, typically, in these sorts of things government authorities know now what’s what. Obviously, these agencies never announce who they might be inquiring about, or what timetables might be at issue.

To get through all of this takes time. It  takes process.

What we got, instead, were headlines like these:

Bleacher Report, atop a Bleacher-written story: “Tyson Gay Suspended for 1 Year Following Failed Drug Test”

Huffington Post, atop an Associated Press account: “U.S. Sprinter Tyson Gay Returns 2012 Olympic Medal After Positive Drug Test”

Both these headlines: factually correct.

The headlines, and the accompanying stories, totally glossed over the larger, and more relevant — the more important — point.

Why was Tyson Gay only getting one year?

A standard doping ban is two years, at least through the end of 2014, until the new World Anti-Doping Agency rules take effect and a standard ban goes up to four.

Gay got half that two. He got one.

Frankly, the news coverage — and the response it provoked on social media — did Gay, USADA and, now, WADA, the IAAF and the International Olympic Committee a disservice.

Because now the entire case is politically charged, and for what?

We get swimmers like Britain’s Michael Jamieson, who won a silver medal in the men’s 200-meter breaststroke in London in 2012, tweeting,

…& is only banned for 1 year, backdated – so he’s eligible to compete from next month. Testosterone isn’t taken by mistake. National…

— Michael Jamieson (@mj88live) May 3, 2014

…governing bodies have too much say in the length of suspension. This story lets us know that there is no real desire to tackle doping!

— Michael Jamieson (@mj88live) May 3, 2014

Mr. Jamieson — to deconstruct, sir, picking up with the word “National”:

The entire point of the USADA and WADA system, just as it is your country, is to take governing bodies such as USA Track & Field out of the process. USATF had nothing — repeat, nothing — to do with any part of this investigation or the one-year ban.

As for that next sentence, you are absolutely entitled to your opinion. And that opinion is ridiculous. To ask the obvious: what first-hand knowledge of Mr. Gay’s case did you have before rendering that judgment?

The reason to ask is that the Daily Mail, the English newspaper, cited you in the story as part of what it called a “furious backlash from athletes” in the headline. The story also went on to quote Sebastian Coe, the London 2012 chair who is a leading candidate to become the next president of the IAAF, track and field’s governing body: “There has to be confidence that the athletes on the track know they will be treated in exactly the same way, and spectators must have complete confidence in knowing what they are watching is legitimate.”

Actually, for sure spectators must have complete confidence in knowing what they are watching is legitimate. That, to be frank, is track and field’s ongoing credibility problem, as absolutely Lord Coe knows well.

But there is no justification for treating everyone the same way. None whatsoever. The rules now allow that if you provide “substantial assistance,” you get a break, plain and simple, as Lord Coe surely knows as well.

What we may now see is Gay’s case appealed. In such cases, the Swiss-based Court of Arbitration for Sport gets the final word. Which means time and money. If that happens, what justice is being served?

Is Gay well-served? USADA? Who, exactly?

It’s ironic, really. In the Lance Armstrong case, USADA is accused of being the ultimate witch-hunter. Here Gay gets a year, and USADA is accused of being too lenient. What, it’s damned if it does and damned if it doesn’t?

This is precisely the crux of the problem with the sound-bite, rush-to-judgment nature of where we are.

Now we get comparisons between Gay’s 12 months and the 18 months Jamaican sprinter Asafa Powell — another big name — got for a supplement with a banned stimulant. (Query: did Powell provide “substantial assistance”? The answer is obvious.)

Yes, for sure, as a corollary matter, it’s interesting and intriguing to try to figure out whether the others on that 2012 U.S silver medal-winning relay team will get to keep their medals — but this is an issue on which the IOC and CAS have gone different ways, given individual fact patterns, in recent years.

It’s a further irony that Justin Gatlin ran on that relay, and he, too, has served a doping ban.

But, again, that’s not the central point.

The key element in the USADA news release, as well as the increased big-picture focus in the anti-doping campaign, is the focus now on the entourage.

Indeed, a new feature of the Code, taking effect at the start of 2015 — just to show how determined WADA is about trying to shake things up — makes it an anti-doping violation for an athlete to associate with an “athlete support person” if the athlete has been formally warned specifically not to do so.

WADA and other anti-doping authorities have learned that athletes typically don’t just go online and order up a mess of steroids; or sketch out a calendar with cycles for usage of substance A, B or C; or intuitively know how to stack steroids X, Y or Z with EPO. These things take money and expertise.

To borrow from the saying: it takes a village. Many successful athletes have a kind of “village” around them. What 15 or so years of the WADA-focused anti-doping campaign has taught is that it is not enough to just go after the athlete, him or herself. You have to disrupt the enablers in that “village” as well, or the status is likely to remain quo.

Back to last Friday’s release: “For providing substantial assistance to USADA; Gay was eligible for up to a three-quarter reduction of the otherwise applicable two-year sanction under the Code (or a six-month suspension).”

Again, Gay’s time could have been cut down to just six months from two years. He got a full year. Does that sound like total leniency?

Just so everyone understands: had this case come up next year, given the WADA Code that goes into effect this coming Jan. 1, given the “substantial assistance” Gay provided, he might well have walked away with no time.

So — here is the deal, literally and figuratively:

Tyson Gay decided to cooperate. Because of that, all athletes, and for that matter, everyone with an interest in clean sport, got a two-for-one. He gave back his unclean medal from London. And now USADA — and, presumably, others — get to go after the entourage.

Gay’s one-year period of ineligibility runs for a year from June 23, 2013, the day his sample was collected at the USA outdoor nationals. Obviously he passed whatever tests there were in London, or we would have known about it; USADA had no evidence of his misconduct from July 15, 2012, the date the release says he first used a product that contained a prohibited substance, until he came forward.

For those who prefer:

One way of looking at his ban — now that he has voluntarily given back his London 2012 medals — is that it is in effect like two years, from July, 2012, through June, 2014. He didn’t just give back that relay medal; he also forfeited all medals, points and prizes from July 15, 2012, forward. Don’t forget that at those same USA 2013 nationals Gay ran a 9.75 100.

Gay said in an interview Saturday with his hometown paper, the Lexington, Ky., Herald-Leader, “There’s a lot for me to tell, my side …”

In time we will all hear it.

Everyone just be patient. Sometimes — a lot of times, actually — that’s the way the real world works.



Exclusive: Kenyan Olympic champions say Tyson Gay's doping ban reduction sends "wrong message"

By Mike Rowbottom
Inside The Games
Wednesday, 07 May 2014

Kenyan Olympic champions Asbel Kiprop and Ezekiel Kemboi have voiced their total opposition to the system of "plea bargaining" which has recently seen US sprinter Tyson Gay's  doping suspension reduced from two to one years in exchange for the provision of information to the United States Anti-Doping Agency.

"I think it is the wrong message to send," Kiprop told insidethegames as he looked ahead to Friday's (May 9) opening International Association of Athletics Federation (IAAF) Diamond League meeting here.

"If reductions on bans are going to be made, athletes will take advantage of it.

"They should tell what they know anyway."

Kiprop, a double world 1500 metre champion, became Olympic 1500m champion retrospectively after the original winner at the 2008 Beijing Games, Rashid Ramzi of Bahrain, was stripped of the title for doping.

Both he and Kemboi, double Olympic champion in the 3000m steeplechase, want the sport to introduce life bans for doping offences.

Ezekiel Kemboi, pictured dancing after regaining the Olympic 3000m steeplechase title at London 2012, is opposed to '"plea bargaining" in doping cases and wants life bans introduced ©Getty Images

Kemboi also objected to the idea of reducing bans in exchange for information.

"Personally I don't think it is a good idea," he said.

"If a ban is four years, let it be four years. If you are an athlete and you have cheated, you have to pay. Take your ban. Even if it is for the first time, it doesn't matter. Athletes have to ask what is in anything they take. They have to take responsibility.

"I propose athletes who cheat should be banned for life. It is not good in sports. Sport is all about togetherness, friendship. So why do you need to cheat to win?"

Kiprop added: "It all relies on the individuals. Because some people they are greedy for success and to make money.

"It is not good for them to race with the clean athletes.

"I think it is important to have tough penalties.

"I totally agree with Ezekiel about life bans."

Gay, the second fastest man in the world behind Usain Bolt, tested positive for a banned steroid at last year's US Championships.

His ban has been calculated from the day he gave the sample, June 23, so he will be eligible to return to competition at the end of next month.

In a statement issued last Friday, US Anti-Doping Agency's (USADA) chief executive, Travis Tygart, commented: "We appreciate Tyson doing the right thing by immediately withdrawing from competition once he was notified, accepting responsibility for his decisions, and fully and truthfully cooperating with us in our ongoing investigation into the circumstances surrounding his case."

Eunice Sum, Kenya's world 800m champion, added her support to a harder line on doping.

"If somebody is taking drugs that is wrong," she said.

"I think bans should be for life."

Britain's European indoor 800m champion Jenny Meadows, who will make her first outdoor appearance for three years following a persistent Achilles tendon injury when she runs in at the Qatar Sports Club track, also disagreed with the principle of "plea bargaining".

"I feel really strongly about this," said the 33-year-old former world and European bronze medallist, who was moved up from silver to gold in the 2011 European indoors after Russia's original winner Yevgeniya Zinurova tested positive.

"For the last few years I haven't had any funding, I haven't had any sponsorship, and I have been trying to fight to keep my career going, and some people dope and take a short cut.

"So obviously I am very anti-doping.

"I do think that that people who have taken drugs should provide information to help catch other people in future, but I don't think the bans should be reduced.

"I think we need harsher penalties.

"If someone has doped they have cheated other people out of a position.

"It's cheating and it's stealing really.

"If people want to help, great.

"But I don't think there should be a reduction in the penalty."

Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum